Explaining the design flaw on the new Port Mann Bridge

Today’s afternoon commute was excruciating with every bridge in town feeling the effects of a blast of winter weather. The new $2.46 billion Port Mann Bridge was hit the hardest thanks to a glaring design flaw that saw huge chunks of ice falling from its supporting cables onto the bridge deck, damaging vehicles and injuring motorists. Having just opened a few short weeks ago this is the first hiccup (and a major one at that) in the young bridges life.

Photo - TheProvince.com
Photo – TheProvince.com

The problem comes from the design of the bridge. The main support towers of the cable stayed section are located in the centre of the bridge between the east and westbound lanes. The suspension cables run from these towers to the bridge deck in 4 groups, 2 of which connect to the bridge deck along the inner lanes directly under the towers. The other two groups attach to the outer edges of the bridge crossing over all lanes of vehicle traffic as you can see in the picture above. This means that in winter weather if there’s ice build up on the cables it will almost always fall onto the bridge deck as it starts to melt. A pretty major design flaw in a part of the world that experiences winter weather.

Photo - Panaramio.com
Photo – Panaramio.com

There are other cable stayed (suspension) bridges in the Lower Mainland and they are also susceptible to cable icing and this has resulted in ice falling onto their bridge decks but they all have a design that makes it a very rare occurrence. In the  photo of the Alex Fraser bridge at the top of this paragraph you can see that the cables go from outer towers straight down to the sides of the bridge never crossing any lanes of traffic. The Golden Ears bridge and Pitt River Bridge have a similar design. The Pattullo and old Port Mann bridge are steel arch truss bridges which means their supporting structures are significantly lower so any ice fall would be at a much lower velocity. Their arched design also provides a gentle slope for ice and water to run off of during ice melt.

I’m not an engineer, I’m a bridge and architecture enthusiast and as such the design flaw of the new Port Mann didn’t occur to me until ice was crushing peoples windshields today. That being said there are some very well paid, highly educated people who designed this bridge who missed this problem completely. It’s not as bad as the Tacoma Narrows bridge design flaw (see video below) but it is one that will rear its ugly head whenever the weather turns cold and icy.

What can be done about it? That’s a good question. Heating the cables will undoubtedly shorten their lifespan but I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that idea released to the public in an effort to calm peoples nerves and this option was dismissed by the designers due to cost. The best answer to that question is one that is never going to happen. The bridge should’ve been designed for ice build up, it wasn’t, it’s too late to change it. I guess someone should’ve told Kiewit Corporation, based in Omaha, Nebraska (which gets winter weather) that it can get cold here on the west coast.



9 thoughts on “Explaining the design flaw on the new Port Mann Bridge

  1. This isn’t a design flaw. It’s bitchy lower mainland residents complaining over a bridge which they already are moaning over due to tolling. How often does vancouver receive snow, rain, wind and shifting temperatures on a daily basis? Its unfortunate people got hurt and some property was damaged. But to complain the bridge has a design flaw is a joke. The bridge works as designed. 2 days of bad weather, will be erased in a matter of hours as rain falls, temperatures rise and we go back to being the normal wet coast we’re used to, and the bridge operates just as it was designed.

    • So you’re ok with a multi billion dollar bridge that can’t be used for a few days each year? You’re much more forgiving than anyone I have ever met. We get winter weather roughly 6-8 days a year, that’s an expensive piece of infrastructure that can’t be used if there’s ice. I’m guessing you don’t live here.


      • Actually I live here and commute over the bridge daily. 6-8 days of winter, of which 2 days this year happened to be a bad winter storm. Hardly something worth all the attention. Cable stay is used in countries with far worse and regular winter weather and they do just fine with similar issues.

      • But very few bridges have cables that cross over lanes of traffic. It’s going to be a problem going forward but I respect that you’re ok with it.

  2. A design engineer might have made a calculated cost decision that leads to short-term closures a few days a year; but once that decision was made a protocol should have been implemented to shut bridge at earliest sign of ice bombs, to have illuminated warning signs and an escape route.
    Instead they simply hoped for the best.
    One thing that this new bridge is any way to quickly shift traffic from ice-bombed lanes to a safer route.

    • I can’t imagine that the design would have included a decision to close the bridge in winter conditions, no matter how short the closure. It’s design oversight, plain and simple.

  3. Jesus will save us all and he will raise his glory upon high to keep evil away from this bridge, hallelujah!

  4. I distinctly recall thinking that the center cable design over the traffic lanes was going to be trouble but then it was just a passing thought by a passing motorist not a trained engineer who would recognize a serious design flaw…had to go with the pretty version rather than the functional one huh?!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s